comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Ada and the NMD
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 17:31:21 GMT
Date: 2001-09-06T17:31:21+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <JpOl7.6776$4z.28585@www.newsranger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrn9pfbm4.ln.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no

In article <slrn9pfbm4.ln.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>, Preben
Randhol says...
>Yes but as I understand the argumentation it is the protection of USA
>against rogue states (not Russia) that is the target. And it doesn't

You are making the mistake of believing that the current arguments you hear are
the *actual* reasons for making it. Things don't work that way here. We come up
with a government program or weapon system, then go looking for good
rationalizations for building it.

This very issue was touched on in, of all places, one of Douglas Adams' "Dirk
Gently" books. I'd give a quote, but I don't have the book handy. Essentially,
one of the main characters struck it rich by creating a sort of reverse-theorem
prover that you could give a conclusion, and it would come up with a set of
plausible-sounding steps to get you to that conclusion. When he got it
completed, the US DoD came in and bought the whole project. He claimed that he
recognised some of the argument patterns in the Congressional Star Wars
arguments. :-)


>have to land to be harmful. I mean just look at the extent of the
>nuclear downfall from Tsjernobyl.

H-bombs and shoddy Soviet nuclear fission plants are *quite* different from each
other. Most folks in this country never figured that one out either, though.

>> silly as the  Star Wars program itself. Almost. There *are* good
>> reasons for being against it,
>
>Such as it is easy to fool the system with flares or something like that
>if I remember correctly?

That's a particularly good one in my book. Why should I, as a taxpayer, spend
loads of my money developing something that will probably be defeatable with
some simple cheap countermeasure? Sure, we can then try to counter the
counter-measure. But that just leads to a vicious cycle where the baddies will
always inevitably be one step ahead. In the end I see tons of money spent for
very little gain. Better to just use the dough to send the terrorists to college
or something. Get them all jobs maintaining Perl code, and they'll be too busy
to even think about blowing anything up. :-)

---
T.E.D.    homepage   - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
          home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com



  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-09-06 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-06  4:53 Ada and the NMD Al Christians
2001-09-06 10:27 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-09-06 11:55   ` Florian Weimer
2001-09-06 18:03     ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-09-07 19:31       ` Florian Weimer
2001-09-06 11:13 ` Preben Randhol
2001-09-06 13:57   ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-06 15:11     ` Preben Randhol
2001-09-06 15:27       ` James Rogers
2001-09-06 16:25         ` Off Topic: NMD/Environment was: (Re: Ada and the NMD) Marin David Condic
2001-09-06 17:57           ` chris.danx
2001-09-06 18:52             ` Darren New
2001-09-06 19:35               ` chris.danx
2001-09-06 20:01                 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-06 21:43               ` Preben Randhol
2001-09-06 21:46                 ` Darren New
2001-09-06 22:13                   ` Preben Randhol
2001-09-07  0:28                     ` Jeff Creem
2001-09-07  8:42                       ` Preben Randhol
2001-09-07  1:27                     ` James Rogers
2001-09-07  8:56                       ` Preben Randhol
2001-09-07 13:43                     ` Marin David Condic
2001-09-07 16:10                       ` James Rogers
2001-09-10 14:57                         ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2001-09-07 13:45                   ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-07 16:06                     ` Darren New
2001-09-08  1:59                       ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-09-10 14:48                       ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-10 15:15                       ` Leif Roar Moldskred
2001-09-08 16:35                     ` Larry Elmore
2001-09-10 14:35                       ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-10 23:01                         ` Larry Elmore
2001-09-07 13:38                 ` Marin David Condic
2001-09-06 18:56             ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-08  0:38               ` Larry Elmore
2001-09-06 17:59         ` Ada and the NMD Ted Dennison
2001-09-06 19:39           ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-09-06 20:15             ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-06 21:31               ` WAY OFF TOPIC was: " Marin David Condic
2001-09-07 14:12                 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-07 16:25                 ` Robert Dewar
2001-09-06 20:34           ` James Rogers
2001-09-06 21:02             ` OT: US Green politics (was: Ada and the NMD) Ted Dennison
2001-09-07  2:06               ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2001-09-07 13:59                 ` Off Topic " Marin David Condic
2001-09-07 16:19             ` Ada and the NMD Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2001-09-10 14:53               ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-06 22:04           ` Preben Randhol
2001-09-07 14:29             ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-08  0:54             ` Larry Elmore
2001-09-06 17:21       ` Dale Pennington
2001-09-06 21:54         ` Preben Randhol
2001-09-10  5:51         ` Richard Riehle
2001-09-10 20:57           ` David Bolen
2001-09-10 21:31             ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-10 21:36             ` Steve Howard
2001-09-06 17:31       ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2001-09-09 11:53         ` Stefan Skoglund
2001-09-06 12:27 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-09-06 16:34 ` William Dale
2001-09-06 19:20 ` Ada in air/missile defense systems (was: Ada and NMD) Michael P. Card
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox