From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: GC - again, :-)
Date: 1997/05/03
Date: 1997-05-03T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <JSA.97May3190215@alexandria> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 01bc5742$bf3c7640$d5fd82c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com
In article <01bc5742$bf3c7640$d5fd82c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> "Nick Roberts" <Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com> writes:
> It seems to me that a representation clause would be the much the best way
> to specify what sort of storage reclamation strategy is applied to a
> storage pool. I would (quite strongly) suggest that full reclamation ought
I disagree. I think the best way to approach this is via a subsystem
of generic packages which present a set of techniques and
implementation strategies. Any storage pools used in the
implementation would not even be visible to clients.
/Jon
--
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-05-03 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-04-29 0:00 GC - again, :-) Jon S Anthony
1997-04-30 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1997-05-01 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-05-02 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1997-05-03 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony [this message]
1997-05-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox