comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: (unverified) Ada mandate cancelled (Greg A would be proud)
Date: 1997/03/10
Date: 1997-03-10T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <JSA.97Mar10161514@alexandria> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.857857451@merv


In article <dewar.857914773@merv> dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:

> "preferred technology" agrees with this position. The trouble with
> an absolute mandate, even in the area where it makes best sense,
> i.e.  war-fighting systems in the narrow sense, is that it generates
> antagonism, and worse, it sends a message that Ad is not suitable in
> other areas.

This is an extremely good point and IMO cannot be overemphasized.


> I actually think the NRC report is somewhat flawed in this area. It
> swallows hook, line, and sinker, the salesman's bogus pitch that
> 4GL's can be used for all major informatoin systems development, a
> fallacy that has been understood in IS circles for some time.

Agreed.  Or more likely they just played the ol' "me too! me too!"
game of wanting to look "appropriately" fadish.


[Story of idiot general, snipped]

> When I related this story to several people, they were angry that
> the general in question was "breaking the law". But that is not my
> main concern in such a case. My concern is that here is a case where
> the technical people involved have made a judgment that Ada is the
> best tool, and that judgment was being overridden for non-technical
> reasons with no substance.

Exactly!  The problem isn't about "breaking the law" - forget the law.
The problem here is about being unthinking feckless wanna bes.  This
kind of crap really honks me off - this fool is using _our_ money and
resources to make completely inappropriate decisions based on little
more than "Oh mommy mommy!  Let me play too!" mindlessness.

I say _fire_ this shithead.  If he (or she) is this mindless in making
decisions about this sort of thing, I sure as _hell_ don't want the
fool making any decsions concerning conflict scenarios and life and
death situations.


> This means that in such a case, DoD is ending up with inferior
> systems and not taking advantage of its investment in new
> technology. It is that situation that is most urgent to avoid.

Right.  Only your way of putting it is much too kind and generous.

/Jon
-- 
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com





  parent reply	other threads:[~1997-03-10  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1997-03-07  0:00 (unverified) Ada mandate cancelled (Greg A would be proud) Sam Harbaugh, Palm Bay, Florida
1997-03-08  0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-03-08  0:00   ` Dave Wood
1997-03-09  0:00     ` Robert S. White
1997-03-09  0:00     ` Larry Kilgallen
1997-03-09  0:00       ` Dave Wood
1997-03-10  0:00       ` Ken Garlington
1997-03-09  0:00     ` Robert Dewar
1997-03-09  0:00       ` Larry Kilgallen
1997-03-10  0:00       ` Jeff Carter
1997-03-13  0:00         ` Pat Rogers
1997-03-10  0:00   ` Jon S Anthony
1997-03-10  0:00   ` Jon S Anthony
1997-03-10  0:00   ` Jon S Anthony [this message]
1997-03-10  0:00   ` Robert I. Eachus
1997-03-11  0:00     ` Robert Dewar
1997-03-12  0:00   ` David Emery
1997-03-13  0:00   ` Steven D.Litvintchouk
1997-03-19  0:00   ` David Emery
1997-03-19  0:00   ` David Taylor
1997-03-13  0:00 ` Charles H. Sampson
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox