From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: Ada/Java
Date: 1997/04/25
Date: 1997-04-25T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <JSA.97Apr24212322@alexandria> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 335E30E2.1F9@bix.com
In article <335E30E2.1F9@bix.com> Tom Moran <tmoran@bix.com> writes:
> > > Must each record be a class? Not all Ada records are tagged types.
> >
> > Java does not support any other kind of first class object which has
> > structure.
> So, at the Jave byte code level there is no structure larger than
> "words"?
You've lost me. The basic point is that you want your Ada to fit in
as transparently as possible with any stuff generated from Java (the
language).
/Jon
--
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-04-25 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-04-16 0:00 Ada/Java tmoran
1997-04-20 0:00 ` Ada/Java Tucker Taft
1997-04-21 0:00 ` Ada/Java Tom Moran
1997-04-22 0:00 ` Ada/Java David Wheeler
1997-04-22 0:00 ` Ada/Java Tom Moran
1997-04-22 0:00 ` Ada/Java Jon S Anthony
1997-04-23 0:00 ` Ada/Java Samuel Tardieu
1997-04-24 0:00 ` Ada/Java Jon S Anthony
1997-04-23 0:00 ` Ada/Java Tom Moran
1997-04-25 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-04-25 0:00 Ada/Java tmoran
1997-04-27 0:00 ` Ada/Java Robert Dewar
1997-04-28 0:00 ` Ada/Java Tom Moran
1997-04-28 0:00 ` Ada/Java Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox