From: jsa@organon.com (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: Can OO be successful in real-time embedded systems?
Date: 1996/05/09
Date: 1996-05-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <JSA.96May9163210@organon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m0uHHBP-0000ztC@crash.cts.com
In article <m0uHHBP-0000ztC@crash.cts.com> "Robert C. Leif, Ph.D." <rleif@MAIL.CTS.COM> writes:
> anyone in the group do run-time dispatching. I know that I could buy a
> compiler with the Safety and Security Annex. However, that is ridiculous
> over-kill. You have provably heard my line, that Ada 95 is the Safety and
> Security annex of C++. First one switches a C or C++ developer to Ada 95,
> then, latter on, one can start discussion of the Safety and Security Annex.
Why "overkill"? BTW, you can just download a compiler that supports
the Safety and Security Annex - Gnat...
/Jon
--
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
1 Williston Road, Suite 4
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com
next parent reply other threads:[~1996-05-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <m0uHHBP-0000ztC@crash.cts.com>
1996-05-09 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony [this message]
1996-05-09 0:00 ` Can OO be successful in real-time embedded systems? Robert A Duff
1996-05-09 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-05-09 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-05-10 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-05-09 0:00 ` Richard Riehle
1996-05-10 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-05-13 0:00 ` Richard Riehle
[not found] <316BF0C5.1FE1@condat.de>
1996-04-11 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
[not found] ` <RMARTIN.96Apr11113222@rcm.oma.com>
[not found] ` <31749A27.3949@ag01.kodak.COM>
[not found] ` <4lggff$r56@gaia.ns.utk.edu>
[not found] ` <4mhh3m$h8m@globe.indirect.com>
1996-05-07 0:00 ` Richard Riehle
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox