From: jsa@organon.com (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: Package names & visibility
Date: 1996/07/08
Date: 1996-07-08T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <JSA.96Jul8131835@organon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: JSA.96Jul5140611@organon.com
In article <Du4v94.8CK@world.std.com> bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) writes:
> In article <JSA.96Jul5140611@organon.com>,
> Jon S Anthony <jsa@organon.com> wrote:
> ...[two reasonable solutions omitted]
> >Option #1 is really the preferred IMO.
>
> My preference is to avoid using the same name for two different
> packages, especially when those packages reference each other, or are
> used together.
>
> - Bob
Oh, you mean the _really_ really preferred approach!
/Jon
--
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
1 Williston Road, Suite 4
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-07-08 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-07-03 0:00 Package names & visibility John Woodruff B481
1996-07-05 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-07-06 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-07-08 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox