From: jsa@organon.com (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: seperate keyword and seperate compilation with Gnat?
Date: 1996/07/15
Date: 1996-07-15T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <JSA.96Jul14204738@organon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 31D95D93.28D8D15B@jinx.sckans.edu
In article <dewar.837148752@schonberg> dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
> he completely misses my point. His proposed additional statement adds
No I don't.
> nothing to the RM. It is not some complex theorem that needs proving,
No one ever said it was.
> For some reason, Jon got confused by what GNAT was doing, and was for a
Not really. Simply missed the bit about the switch.
> Jon, if all you are proposing is adding your one sentence, I think that
As I have stated several times, I am not proposing adding this
statement. Apparently you have missed my only point. Which was
simply that that statement, contrary to your claim(s), is _FAR_
clearer on the subject than all the RM has to say about it. This is
so OBVIOUS that to disagree with it is really to defy credulity.
> According to Jon's thinking, as far as I can understand it, if someone
> was confused on this point, he would suggest adding a statement like
But you do not understand my thinking... Oh well.
> that says that this particular kind of unit is not needed. We have a
> general concept of semantic dependency, which is well defined in the RM,
Yes, but not particularly clear.
> and covers ALL such cases in a nice uniform way -- why single one out
> just because someone got confused by what one implementation did?
I am not suggesting this.
Robert,
Sometimes you can be a bit exasperating. I never suggested adding the
statement to the RM. This whole silly discussion started simply because
you claimed there was no _possible_ way to state things more clearly on
this issue than what the RM says. I showed that this was just patently
false. You then (for reasons I am unclear about) took this as implying
that I thought this new statement _should_ have been in the RM. I said
no that's not what I meant, only that it is (obviously) clearer.
/Jon
--
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
1 Williston Road, Suite 4
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-07-15 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-07-02 0:00 seperate keyword and seperate compilation with Gnat? David Morton
1996-07-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-18 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1996-07-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-02 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1996-07-03 0:00 ` *separate* keyword and *separate* " David Morton
1996-07-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-03 0:00 ` seperate keyword and seperate " Robert Dewar
1996-07-17 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1996-07-02 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1996-07-02 0:00 ` David Morton
1996-07-03 0:00 ` Rob Kirkbride
1996-07-03 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-07-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-08 0:00 ` John Herro
1996-07-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-10 0:00 ` John Herro
1996-07-10 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-09 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-07-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-09 0:00 ` progers
1996-07-08 0:00 ` michael
1996-07-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-12 0:00 ` David Morton
1996-07-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-16 0:00 ` Michael Paus
1996-07-08 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-07-03 0:00 ` Mike Card (x3022)
1996-07-04 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-07-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-04 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-07-05 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-07-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-05 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-07-09 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-07-09 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-07-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-12 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-07-21 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-07-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-14 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-07-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-15 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony [this message]
1996-07-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-16 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox