From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Is this a GNAT bug???
Date: 30 Apr 2002 09:15:47 -0500
Date: 2002-04-30T09:15:47-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <IZnU1lAp3wz5@eisner.encompasserve.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5ee5b646.0204291844.21d7f5f0@posting.google.com
In article <5ee5b646.0204291844.21d7f5f0@posting.google.com>, dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes:
> If you were a customer of ACT, and willing to pay for this feature to be
> added, no doubt ACT could be persuaded to accomodate you :-)
In fact, when you agreed to pay for the feature, you would become
a customer of ACT :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-30 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-26 16:36 Is this a GNAT bug??? Robert Quinn
2002-04-26 17:48 ` Mark Johnson
2002-04-26 22:20 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-29 15:45 ` Robert Quinn
2002-04-30 2:44 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-30 14:15 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
2002-04-30 16:41 ` Robert Quinn
2002-04-30 18:20 ` tmoran
2002-05-01 1:31 ` Robert Quinn
2002-05-01 17:08 ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-02 1:55 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-05-02 14:04 ` Mark Johnson
2002-05-02 15:25 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-04-30 21:55 ` Mark Johnson
2002-05-01 22:59 ` Nick Roberts
2002-05-02 13:56 ` Mark Johnson
2002-05-02 20:19 ` Nick Roberts
2002-05-02 21:55 ` Mark Johnson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-20 22:50 Is this a gnat bug? Waldek Hebisch
2003-09-20 23:09 ` Ludovic Brenta
2003-09-21 2:37 ` Waldek Hebisch
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox