From: Sandro Magi <smagi@naasking.homeip.net>
Subject: Invalid operator name?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 11:23:04 -0500
Date: 2004-11-27T11:23:04-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <IR1qd.68030$Ro.2624307@news20.bellglobal.com> (raw)
When I try to define my own operator, I receive an "Invalid operator name"
error during compilation. I've found references to operator overloading in
reference materials, but no word whether new operators can be defined which
leads me to believe that it's not possible.
Is it not possible to define new operators for a custom type? Can we only
override the base operators?
next reply other threads:[~2004-11-27 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-27 16:23 Sandro Magi [this message]
2004-11-27 16:50 ` Invalid operator name? Stephen Leake
2004-11-27 19:21 ` Martin Krischik
2004-11-27 21:47 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox