From: CONDIC@PSAVAX.PWFL.COM
Subject: Re: Ada saved by gnat (was Re: Where's Aetech?)
Date: 1995/04/21
Date: 1995-04-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <INFO-ADA%95042115084536@VM1.NODAK.EDU> (raw)
From: Marin David Condic, 407.796.8997, M/S 731-93
Subject: Re: Ada saved by gnat (was Re: Where's Aetech?)
Original_To: PROFS%"SMTP@PWAGPDB"
Original_cc: CONDIC
David Weller <dweller@STARBASE.NEOSOFT.COM> writes:
>
>the last year (hmm, I guess I just did :-). Many of those people
>have picked up GNAT and were able to explore Ada without the
>slightest financial committment. And, yes, they knew they were
>getting what they were paying for :-) Also, GNAT has given me
>
David:
I personally think that GNAT may do a lot to help "bootstrap"
Ada95 usage, but I think it's important to point out that it isn't
real likely to cut into the commercial vendor's business - at
least with respect to major software development efforts for
critical products. It also isn't going to guarantee the long term
success of Ada95 - so it's no panacea.
Could you imagine persuading the Air Force to commit themselves to
flight-certifying software or risking expensive payloads on a
compiler that someone downloaded from the Internet and has no
"corporate" support behind it? (Maybe in "the olden days" but not
likely today!) Our customers *know* we need a vendor behind us as
part of "the team" who is going to provide bug fixes, tools,
customizations, etc.
And even for "non-critical" applications, I would think that most
intelligent developers would want a company behind their compiler
who would provide them with telephone support, a commitment to
continued growth of the product, related tools, etc. "Free" might
be nice when you're just playing games, but when your business
depends on long term commitments to the tools you use, "free" can
get pretty costly! (O.K.! Not all things worth doing are worth
doing well. I'm talking about software development that represents
a significant investment in time, money & expected lifespan.)
In other words - it's probably good that GNAT is out there as a
learning tool, but I can't see it as a substitute for a good
quality commercial product with lots of support software bundled
around it and an "800" number to call when the software doesn't
work as expected. Hence, it's probably not much of a threat to
commercial vendors and if they see it that way, then they aren't
looking at the value they should be adding to the product.
As for cost? I still believe that if Ada95 is going to get
anywhere, there needs to be a shrink-wrapped product at CompUSA
with manuals, bindings, support tools, etc for popular home
computers at somewhere between $200 and $400. (Best bet, is to get
the base product under $200 and don't wuss out on the support!) If
someone were to take GNAT and build such a product out of it,
you'd stand a good chance of making it successful.
The only sympathy I'll give to compiler vendors who charge five
figures or more for their tools is when you start looking at
target hardware that is extremely esoteric and have lots of
requirements for customizations to the product. If there are only
twelve "Gazorenthorpe Microprocessors" sold per year - but you
absolutely have to have them because of the specialized nature of
the product - *no* compiler is going to be cheap. (Maybe this is
where Ada suffers from it's military roots? How many ATF's are we
going to sell? How many "specialized" processors are in one of
these? How many compilers does that mean we're going to buy?)
(Oh. And before someone jumps up and says "You ought to be using
COTS processors on this sort of stuff" I'll answer with this
challenge: Show me a Mil packaged, rad hard, at-or-near 100%
testable, space-proven, COTS processor - complete with ICE-boxes,
logic analyzers, etc., that I can buy at Radio Shack for under
$50.00 and I'll buy you dinner at the restaurant of your choice
here in West Palm Beach.)
Pax,
Marin
Marin David Condic, Senior Computer Engineer ATT: 407.796.8997
M/S 731-93 Technet: 796.8997
Pratt & Whitney, GESP Internet: CONDICMA@PWFL.COM
P.O. Box 109600 Internet: MDCONDIC@AOL.COM
West Palm Beach, FL 33410-9600
===============================================================================
Please send responses to one of the addresses in this trailer.
A "reply" to the address in the message header will bounce.
===============================================================================
"The cost of living has just gone up another dollar a quart."
-- W. C. Fields
===============================================================================
next reply other threads:[~1995-04-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-04-21 0:00 CONDIC [this message]
1995-04-22 0:00 ` Ada saved by gnat (was Re: Where's Aetech?) David Weller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-04-05 0:00 tmoran
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Laurent Gasser
[not found] ` <SRCTRAN.95Apr8101259@world.std.com>
[not found] ` <3mjccv$gts@news.znet.com>
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Tore Joergensen
1995-04-19 0:00 ` David Weller
[not found] ` <3mjcci$gcg@news.znet.com>
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Rajat Datta
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-20 0:00 ` Rajat Datta
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Dale Pontius
1995-04-21 0:00 ` cjames
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-03 0:00 tmoran
1995-04-03 0:00 ` Sean McNeil
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox