From: Wes Groleau <groleau+news@freeshell.org>
Subject: Re: C omega
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 12:49:21 -0500
Date: 2004-06-05T12:49:21-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <I5KdnUK8ioHjml_dRVn-hA@gbronline.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <u8yf2jd3j.fsf@obry.org>
Pascal Obry wrote:
> Something quite interesting. Microsoft is going to add some concurrency
> support in C-omega. There is a paper on the link I gave in a previous message.
This reminds me of a thirty-year-old (?) advertising slogan
from DEC: "Digital has it now!"
I guess they wanted us to think
"You don't have to wait for _________"
but every time I saw it, I thought,
"OK, we're a little slow, but we finally have ________"
--
Wes Groleau
Nobody believes a theoretical analysis -- except the guy who did it.
Everybody believes an experimental analysis -- except the guy who did it.
-- Unknown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-05 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-05 14:25 C omega Pascal Obry
2004-06-05 17:49 ` Wes Groleau [this message]
2004-06-05 22:06 ` Adrian Knoth
2004-06-05 23:55 ` Roland Illig
2004-06-06 2:21 ` James Rogers
2004-06-06 2:53 ` Wes Groleau
2004-06-06 18:09 ` [off-topic] bad puns Wes Groleau
2004-06-06 9:47 ` C omega Pascal Obry
2004-06-06 12:32 ` James Rogers
2004-06-06 9:49 ` Pascal Obry
2004-06-06 22:14 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-06-07 11:17 ` I R T
2004-06-07 15:45 ` Adrian Knoth
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox