From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: thick? thin? binding
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 00:23:03 GMT
Date: 2002-06-26T00:23:03+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <HP7S8.488$vb.91113628@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200620022129217771%demery@cox.rr.com
> Although I'm certainly biased, I still think that the best discussion
> on the issues associated with Ada bindings is the rationale in
> IEEE Std 1003.5....
We stole, er, learned from, the POSIX standard for the development
of CLAW. Sincerest form of flattery and all. ;)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-26 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-19 18:53 thick? thin? binding Immanuel Scholz
2002-06-19 19:22 ` tmoran
2002-06-19 19:27 ` Stephen Leake
2002-06-19 19:50 ` Immanuel Scholz
2002-06-19 20:25 ` tmoran
2002-06-19 19:27 ` chris.danx
2002-06-19 19:28 ` Stephen Leake
2002-06-20 14:12 ` Ted Dennison
2002-06-21 1:29 ` David Emery
2002-06-26 0:23 ` tmoran [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox