Re: Ada -vs- GNAT

["chris.danx" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com>]

"Pascal Obry" <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
news:usn4g88ku.fsf@wanadoo.fr...
>
> "chris.danx" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com> writes:
>
> > No, having two pragmas that do the same thing is what IMO is clutter
(when
> > just one will do, and there's one already present).  Perhaps I should
say
> > what I mean by clutter, I mean it's more or less another name for the
same
> > thing, so it could be uneccessary.  It may make it easier to read, but
it's
> > just a short hand for something.
>
> That's wrong ! There is no short hand here. Read my previous post.

ok, in view of that I agree it's a useful addition but why only warnings?
Surely to reference a thing you've said you won't is an error not only
warning worthy?


Chris