From: rick H <rik_nntp@dsl.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: Instantiating private types with discriminants?
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:27:18 GMT
Date: 2006-05-11T08:27:18+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <GzC8g.28985$Nb2.526015@news1.nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: i4rqev137oq1.161jykmec6dts.dlg@40tude.net
Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 16:52:32 -0500, Rick H wrote:
>
>> But all this has a side-effect that I haven't considered: the fact
>> that a variable declared as a class-wide type *requires* initialization
>> means that the compiler can determine the variable's type statically.
>
> No. It only means that the type should be determinable at run-time. There
> are may ways to do it. You can call a function with a class-wide result.
>
> It might be especially interesting to take a look at S'Class'Input
> attribute. It "dispatches" on a "bare" tag. [ Ada 2005 will offer a
> mechanism for fully user-defined things like this. See
> Generic_Dispatching_Constructor. ]
>
>> This means that the following will raise a constraint error:
>> declare
>> Var_A : General_T'Class := Get (10); -- Type_A
>> begin
>> Put (Var_A);
>> Ada.Text_IO.New_Line;
>> Var_A := Get (100.0); -- Type_B - constraint error!
>> Put (Var_A);
>> end;
>
> Yes, but this is a different thing. You cannot change tag, either
> dynamically or statically determined. Type mutators are no-no in Ada's type
> system.
>
Thanks Dmitry & Jeffrey.
Objects of class-wide types notwithstanding, I modified Ludovic's code
example to change Type_A and Type_B into linked-list elements. That
meant no more objects of class-wide type, so I got rid of the Get
definitions. The following code does exactly what I wanted from this
cut-down example: a list of either-Integer-or-Floats. Next mystery:
what's the use of abstract subprograms? Put (X:in Type_A) and
Put (X:in Type_B) "feel" like just overloaded functions - why do they
"need" an abstract parent Put (X : in General_T)? Since General_T
is abstract, the latter Put will never be called. Or have I missed the
point again!?
with Ada.Float_Text_IO;
with Ada.Integer_Text_IO;
with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Dispatch is
package P is
type General_T;
type Linked_List_T is access all General_T'Class;
type General_T is abstract tagged record
Next : Linked_List_T;
end record;
procedure Put (Item : in General_T) is abstract;
type Type_A is new General_T with record
Data : Integer;
end record;
procedure Put (Item : in Type_A);
type Type_B is new General_T with record
Data : Float;
end record;
procedure Put (Item : in Type_B);
end P;
package body P is
procedure Put (Item : in Type_A) is
begin
Ada.Text_IO.Put ("A: ");
Ada.Integer_Text_IO.Put (Item.Data);
end Put;
procedure Put (Item : in Type_B) is
begin
Ada.Text_IO.Put ("B: ");
Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put (Item.Data);
end Put;
end P;
use P;
My_List : Linked_List_T := null;
begin
-- generate some data
My_List := new Type_A'(Next => My_List, Data => 100);
My_List := new Type_B'(Next => My_List, Data => 64.5);
My_List := new Type_A'(Next => My_List, Data => 12);
My_List := new Type_B'(Next => My_List, Data => 100.0);
-- print it all out - dispatcher will choose the right "Put".
declare
Iterator : Linked_List_T := My_List;
begin
while Iterator /= null loop
Put (Iterator.all);
Ada.Text_IO.New_Line;
Iterator := Iterator.all.Next;
end loop;
end;
end Dispatch;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-11 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-09 13:17 Instantiating private types with discriminants? rick H
2006-05-09 13:45 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-09 14:06 ` rick H
2006-05-09 13:56 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-09 14:24 ` rick H
2006-05-09 19:48 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-09 14:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-09 14:48 ` rick H
2006-05-09 15:20 ` Jerry Petrey
2006-05-09 15:42 ` rick H
2006-05-09 15:53 ` Avoiding use Ada.Tags (was Re: Instantiating private types with discriminants?) Alex R. Mosteo
2006-05-09 16:01 ` Instantiating private types with discriminants? Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-10 7:42 ` rick H
2006-05-10 9:09 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-10 11:49 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-10 13:44 ` rick H
2006-05-10 14:21 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-10 15:10 ` rick H
2006-05-10 15:45 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-10 14:41 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-10 15:34 ` rick H
2006-05-10 19:01 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-10 19:05 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-10 21:52 ` Rick H
2006-05-11 1:17 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-05-11 7:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-11 8:27 ` rick H [this message]
2006-05-11 10:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-11 15:59 ` Robert A Duff
2006-05-12 7:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-12 9:24 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-12 12:40 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-12 18:25 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-05-09 19:57 ` "Use" and "=" for Tags (was: Re: Instantiating private types with discriminants?) Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox