comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rick H <rik_nntp@dsl.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: Instantiating private types with discriminants?
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:27:18 GMT
Date: 2006-05-11T08:27:18+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <GzC8g.28985$Nb2.526015@news1.nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: i4rqev137oq1.161jykmec6dts.dlg@40tude.net

Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 16:52:32 -0500, Rick H wrote:
> 
>> But all this has a side-effect that I haven't considered: the fact
>> that a variable declared as a class-wide type *requires* initialization
>> means that the compiler can determine the variable's type statically.
> 
> No. It only means that the type should be determinable at run-time. There
> are may ways to do it. You can call a function with a class-wide result.
> 
> It might be especially interesting to take a look at S'Class'Input
> attribute. It "dispatches" on a "bare" tag. [ Ada 2005 will offer a
> mechanism for fully user-defined things like this. See
> Generic_Dispatching_Constructor. ]
> 
>> This means that the following will raise a constraint error:
>> declare
>>    Var_A : General_T'Class := Get (10);  -- Type_A
>> begin
>>    Put (Var_A);
>>    Ada.Text_IO.New_Line;
>>    Var_A := Get (100.0);      -- Type_B - constraint error!
>>    Put (Var_A);
>> end;
> 
> Yes, but this is a different thing. You cannot change tag, either
> dynamically or statically determined. Type mutators are no-no in Ada's type
> system.
> 
Thanks Dmitry & Jeffrey.
Objects of class-wide types notwithstanding, I modified Ludovic's code
example to change Type_A and Type_B into linked-list elements.  That
meant no more objects of class-wide type, so I got rid of the Get
definitions.  The following code does exactly what I wanted from this
cut-down example: a list of either-Integer-or-Floats.  Next mystery:
what's the use of abstract subprograms? Put (X:in Type_A) and
Put (X:in Type_B) "feel" like just overloaded functions - why do they
"need" an abstract parent Put (X : in General_T)?  Since General_T
is abstract, the latter Put will never be called.  Or have I missed the
point again!?


with Ada.Float_Text_IO;
with Ada.Integer_Text_IO;
with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Dispatch is
   package P is
      type General_T;
      type Linked_List_T is access all General_T'Class;
      type General_T is abstract tagged record
         Next : Linked_List_T;
      end record;

      procedure Put (Item : in General_T) is abstract;

      type Type_A is new General_T with record
         Data : Integer;
      end record;

      procedure Put (Item : in Type_A);

      type Type_B is new General_T with record
         Data : Float;
      end record;

      procedure Put (Item : in Type_B);
   end P;


   package body P is
      procedure Put (Item : in Type_A) is
      begin
         Ada.Text_IO.Put ("A: ");
         Ada.Integer_Text_IO.Put (Item.Data);
      end Put;

      procedure Put (Item : in Type_B) is
      begin
         Ada.Text_IO.Put ("B: ");
         Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put (Item.Data);
      end Put;
   end P;

   use P;
   My_List : Linked_List_T := null;
begin
      --  generate some data
      My_List := new Type_A'(Next => My_List, Data => 100);
      My_List := new Type_B'(Next => My_List, Data => 64.5);
      My_List := new Type_A'(Next => My_List, Data => 12);
      My_List := new Type_B'(Next => My_List, Data => 100.0);

   --  print it all out - dispatcher will choose the right "Put".
   declare
      Iterator : Linked_List_T := My_List;
   begin
      while Iterator /= null loop
         Put (Iterator.all);
         Ada.Text_IO.New_Line;
         Iterator := Iterator.all.Next;
      end loop;
   end;
end Dispatch;




  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-11  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-09 13:17 Instantiating private types with discriminants? rick H
2006-05-09 13:45 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-09 14:06   ` rick H
2006-05-09 13:56 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-09 14:24   ` rick H
2006-05-09 19:48     ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-09 14:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-09 14:48 ` rick H
2006-05-09 15:20   ` Jerry Petrey
2006-05-09 15:42     ` rick H
2006-05-09 15:53   ` Avoiding use Ada.Tags (was Re: Instantiating private types with discriminants?) Alex R. Mosteo
2006-05-09 16:01   ` Instantiating private types with discriminants? Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-10  7:42     ` rick H
2006-05-10  9:09       ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-10 11:49         ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-10 13:44         ` rick H
2006-05-10 14:21           ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-10 15:10             ` rick H
2006-05-10 15:45               ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-10 14:41           ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-10 15:34             ` rick H
2006-05-10 19:01               ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-10 19:05                 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-10 21:52                   ` Rick H
2006-05-11  1:17                     ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-05-11  7:44                     ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-11  8:27                       ` rick H [this message]
2006-05-11 10:28                         ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-11 15:59                           ` Robert A Duff
2006-05-12  7:37                             ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-12  9:24                               ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-12 12:40                                 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-05-12 18:25                                   ` Randy Brukardt
2006-05-09 19:57   ` "Use" and "=" for Tags (was: Re: Instantiating private types with discriminants?) Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox