Re: Commercial license?

["Jeffrey Creem" <jeff@thecreems.com>]

If you are looking for something
"Victor Porton" <porton@ex-code.com> wrote in message
news:E18riJl-0007FK-00@porton.narod.ru...
> I retell that am going to release UniParser as both GPL and XXX.
>
> Question: what commercial license XXX would be appropriate for
> a commercial Ada library distributed with source (forgotten
> redistribution, per developer or site license)? Well, forgotten
> redistribution of additional components of the commercial edition.
>
> Maybe for Ada software I need to say something special about
> reliability, not a typical "NO WARRANTY"? Well, now it is alpha.


I think the term you want is not commercial but rather proprietary.
There is nothing about the GPL that makes it not commercial.

In any case, it is possible that most (all?) proprietary licenses might
themselves
be copyrighted so you may not be able to use someone else's license text as
your own.

Try looking at other people who have dual licensed their source code (like
www.rrsoftware.com)
They have a package called claw with both GPL and something more like a
standard
proprietary license.