Re: Missing **-operator in GNAT 3.14?

["Steve Doiel" <nospam_steved94@attbi.com>]

"Robert Dewar" <dewar@gnat.com> wrote in message
news:5ee5b646.0204021702.bb04357@posting.google.com...
> "Sergey Koshcheyev" <serko84@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<a8con5$2emm$1@ns.felk.cvut.cz>...
> > So the second operand of "**" has to be of type Natural,
> > regardless of the type of the first operand.
>
> Good going Sergey, I was wondering when someone might
> actually look up the declaration of "**". After all the
> diagnostic said that no matching "**" was declared, you
> would think the first reaction would be to go look at the
> declared "**" and see why it does not match :-)

Gee.  If I didn't know better I would think you were a professor who makes
his students think (and gives positive feedback when someone getss it right)
 :-)

SteveD