From: graham@clsi.COM (Paul Graham)
Subject: Change to obscure visibility rule in 9x
Date: 18 Oct 1994 13:44:58 GMT
Date: 1994-10-18T13:44:58+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <GRAHAM.94Oct18094458@clsi.clsi.COM> (raw)
Why did Ada 83 have this rule, and why did 9x eliminate it?
8.3(16) Within the specification of a subprogram, every declaration
with the same designator as the subprogram is hidden ... where
hidden in this manner, a declaration is visible neither by selection
nor directly.
Paul
--
Paul Graham graham@compass-da.com Compass Design Automation, Inc.
(speaking only for myself) "Cekoslovakyalilastiramadiklarimizdanmissiniz."
next reply other threads:[~1994-10-18 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-10-18 13:44 Paul Graham [this message]
1994-10-18 15:23 ` Change to obscure visibility rule in 9x Robert I. Eachus
[not found] <GRAHAM.94Oct18094458@clsi.clsi.com>
1994-10-18 17:38 ` Bob Duff
1994-10-20 4:01 ` Paul Graham
[not found] ` <GRAHAM.94Oct20000151@canopus.clsi.com>
1994-10-20 14:46 ` Bob Duff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1994-10-19 9:39 Simtel20 Transfer
[not found] <INFO-ADA%94101904360935@vm1.nodak.edu>
1994-10-19 12:33 ` Bob Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox