comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tmoran@bix.com
Subject: Re: Unconstrained type Unchecked_Deallocation
Date: 2000/03/06
Date: 2000-03-06T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <GITw4.4091$w9.85382@news.pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8a0h55$qc5$1@nnrp1.deja.com

>> The real question is will the Free procedure deallocate all the bytes
>> allocated with the following?
>Of course. If not, your compiler is seriously broken!
  The real question is why the questioner started on the assumption
that Unchecked_Deallocation didn't work in a standard situation, but
but was happily accepted by the compiler in that situation.
  With most Ada compilers, it's better to start on the assumption
the compiler, as well as the language, was not designed by amateurs.
If you think something is broken, try it with a test program.  If
that proves it is in fact broken, then it's reasonable to ask (perhaps
on c.l.a.) if the error is in the compiler or the language.




      parent reply	other threads:[~2000-03-06  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-03-05  0:00 Unconstrained type Unchecked_Deallocation Andy Askey
2000-03-06  0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-03-06  0:00   ` John English
2000-03-06  0:00     ` Ted Dennison
     [not found]     ` <38C566CE.6283C0AD@rational.com>
2000-03-08  0:00       ` Robert Dewar
2000-03-08  0:00         ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-04-05  0:00         ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-04-06  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-09  0:00             ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-04-09  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-12  0:00                 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-04-06  0:00           ` P. S. Norby
2000-03-06  0:00   ` tmoran [this message]
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox