From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: non-library level finalization
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:42:41 -0600
Date: 2005-03-21T15:42:41-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <FumdnY_kGf_eoqLfRVn-tA@megapath.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: eIKdnT-oNJ6gvqPfRVn-pA@comcast.com
Get Ada 2005, in which that restriction is removed?? :-)
Randy.
<tmoran@acm.org> wrote in message news:eIKdnT-oNJ6gvqPfRVn-pA@comcast.com...
> I have a generic package that would benefit from doing some cleanup when
> an instantiation disappears. It can't just declare a (private)
> Finalization_Controlled object because that would require all
> instantiations to be at library level. Suggestions?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-21 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-21 1:28 non-library level finalization tmoran
2005-03-21 9:01 ` Martin Dowie
2005-03-21 13:09 ` Ada2005 again, was: " Tapio Kelloniemi
2005-03-21 14:59 ` Martin Dowie
2005-03-21 21:48 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-03-21 15:54 ` Robert A Duff
2005-03-21 21:42 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2005-03-21 21:54 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-03-21 22:37 ` tmoran
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox