From: stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft)
Subject: Re: Sequential???
Date: 1999/01/23
Date: 1999-01-23T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F60F9B.9yr.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m3sod2a202.fsf@mheaney.ni.net
Matthew Heaney (matthew_heaney@acm.org) wrote:
: [... excellent explanation of when you know Get_Line is "done"...]
: ...
: I hope this clears up the Get_Line mystery. Post a follow-up if there's
: anything that's not clear.
Thanks for that extremely clear presentation. Even though I already
knew the rule ;-), your presentation of it was better than mine
ever would have been.
: Matt
--
-Tucker Taft stt@averstar.com http://www.averstar.com/~stt/
Technical Director, Distributed IT Solutions (www.averstar.com/tools)
AverStar (formerly Intermetrics, Inc.) Burlington, MA USA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-01-23 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-01-23 0:00 Sequential??? JoeLngstn
1999-01-23 0:00 ` Sequential??? Matthew Heaney
1999-01-23 0:00 ` Tucker Taft [this message]
1999-01-29 0:00 ` Sequential??? JoeLngstn
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox