From: rdriehle@nps.navy.mil ("Riehle, Richard")
Subject: re: re: re: crosstalk article on ada
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:06:53 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2001-03-21T19:06:53+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F5AD48747FC0324EB21B2B2BD27D5E8698B48F@Saipan> (raw)
Sorry to have over-reacted to the "opposing view" comments
of the Crosstalk editor. I have heard from several of your who
read the introductory remarks more carefully than I. Upon
re-reading them, I realized that this article was the opposing
view, a response to the collection of erroneous views about Ada
in an earlier issue of Crosstalk. Apologize for my mis-reading.
Richard Riehle
--
Posted from monterey.nps.navy.mil [131.120.18.26]
via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
next reply other threads:[~2001-03-21 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-21 19:06 "Riehle, Richard" [this message]
2001-03-21 19:41 ` re: re: re: crosstalk article on ada Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox