From: stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft)
Subject: Re: with System still required for address clauses ?
Date: 1998/08/25
Date: 1998-08-25T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ey9GBF.MDq.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 35E2E9D3.73566873@elca-matrix.ch
Mats Weber (Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch) wrote:
: if I have an address clause
: for X'Address use <something>;
: do I still need a with clause for System (provided, of course, that I can
: write <something> without visibility on System), as was required in Ada 83, or
: was this dropped in Ada 95 ? The Ada 83 rule stating this is in RM83 13.5(3).
No, you no longer need a "with" clause on System. An implicit semantic
dependence is created on package System, even if you don't have an
explicit "with" clause for it. This is a general rule for attribute
references which have types not declared in package Standard.
See RM95 10.1.1(26).
--
-Tucker Taft stt@inmet.com http://www.inmet.com/~stt/
Intermetrics, Inc. Burlington, MA USA
prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-08-25 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-08-25 0:00 with System still required for address clauses ? Mats Weber
1998-08-25 0:00 ` Tucker Taft [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox