Re: avl tree - booch components

[dwparsons@t-online.de (Dave Parsons)]

On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 18:27:48, Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> wrote:

> dwparsons@t-online.de (Dave Parsons) writes:
> 
> > Yes, I compiled all the tests and demos last weekend.  I had to turn
> > off the style checking though, too many lines too long.
> 
> -gnaty gives errors on 3.13p, I'm used to warnings with 3.14a1. Sorry.
> The 'lines too long' are typically the revision control strings, shame
> CVS doesn't let you customise what $Id$ gives you ..
> 
> > Only queue_tests_concurrent seemed to have a serious problem. It
> > compiled ok but hung near the end.
> 
> Hmm, on Linux it works as expected when run from the makefile but
> locks up when run from the command line: ... stranger & stranger,
> actually it works *every other time*. More investigation needed.
> 
> > All the others ran ok and the results looked ok except for
> > map_test_concurrent, M10G, M11G, M10S & M11S.
> 
> This is correct behaviour, I forgot to update that test; this is the diff
> 
> --- map_test_concurrent.adb     2001/04/14 08:35:27     1.6
> +++ map_test_concurrent.adb     2001/09/09 18:09:38
> @@ -340,13 +340,13 @@
>      Assertion (MUS."=" (The_US.Map_U_Pu1, Map_U_Pu3),
>                 "** M09S: Maps are not equal");
>    end;
> -  Assertion (MBG.Available (The_BG.Map_B_Pu1) = 297,
> +  Assertion (MBG.Available (The_BG.Map_B_Pu1) = 97,
>               "** M10G: Available space is not correct");
> -  Assertion (MBG.Available (The_BG.Map_B_Pu2) = 300,
> +  Assertion (MBG.Available (The_BG.Map_B_Pu2) = 100,
>               "** M11G: Available space is not correct");
> -  Assertion (MBS.Available (The_BS.Map_B_Pu1) = 297,
> +  Assertion (MBS.Available (The_BS.Map_B_Pu1) = 97,
>               "** M10S: Available space is not correct");
> -  Assertion (MBS.Available (The_BS.Map_B_Pu2) = 300,
> +  Assertion (MBS.Available (The_BS.Map_B_Pu2) = 100,
>               "** M11S: Available space is not correct");
>    Put_Line ("Completed map tests");
> 
> > I've never used the Booch Components before on any platform, so I
> > don't know how this compares with other versions.
> > 
> > Comments anyone?
> 
> Thanks for the report.

Ok, good, thanks to you also for confirming that this version is working
resonably well.

I'll update that test and see how it goes.

-- 
Dave