From: DWParsons@T-Online.de (Dave Parsons)
Subject: Re: 3.14p Binary for OS/2. Was: Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT?
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 08:11:29 +0100
Date: 2002-03-03T08:11:29+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ej0w7lFo08Zw-pn2-CtYJN6LqSJHN@jupiter.dwparsons.dialin.t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5ee5b646.0203020900.6f28c05d@posting.google.com
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002 17:00:53, dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote:
>
> Messages like this should be addressed to report@gnat.com
> No one from ACT regularly reads CLA, and we don't process
> any reports or requests like this from CLA.
>
> Thanks again for this work!
Ok, thanks. I'll use that address next time.
BTW, is there a better place, newsgroup or mailing list, to
discuss build related problems?
Cheers,
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-03 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-22 15:52 Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT? DuckE
2001-09-23 0:29 ` Robert Dewar
2001-09-23 10:12 ` Florian Weimer
2001-09-24 13:54 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-27 15:32 ` Florian Weimer
2001-09-28 13:38 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-29 20:38 ` Florian Weimer
2001-09-23 15:20 ` Dave Parsons
2001-09-24 13:59 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-30 16:00 ` Robert Dewar
2001-09-25 4:00 ` Robert Dewar
2001-09-25 6:12 ` Source of 3.13p binary for OS/2. (Was: Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT?) Dave Parsons
2001-09-30 15:58 ` Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT? Robert Dewar
2002-03-02 10:24 ` 3.14p Binary for OS/2. Was: " Dave Parsons
2002-03-02 17:00 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-03 7:11 ` Dave Parsons [this message]
2002-03-03 13:54 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-04 10:41 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-05 6:10 ` Dave Parsons
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox