From: tmoran@bix.com
Subject: Re: Overlay allowability
Date: 2000/05/01
Date: 2000-05-01T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EfkP4.1042$XX5.880190@news.pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 390D94FB.D23390D4@lmco.com
>A few times in my career I've encountered situations where two different
>representations of the same set of bits are desired in a high
Why can't you use Unchecked_Conversion? Then at least the
compiler has an opportunity to warn you if dope vectors, tags,
alignment padding, etc, are going to result in a different number
of bits than you expected.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-05-01 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-05-01 0:00 Overlay allowability Marc A. Criley
2000-05-01 0:00 ` tmoran [this message]
2000-05-01 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-05-01 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
2000-05-08 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-05-01 0:00 ` mark_biggar
2000-05-03 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-05-01 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-03 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
2000-05-03 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-05-03 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-08 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
2000-05-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-09 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
2000-05-09 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-10 0:00 ` Marc A. Criley
2000-05-11 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-05-12 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-05-02 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-05-03 0:00 ` Marc A. Criley
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox