From: Karel Miklav <karel@inetis.spppambait.com>
Subject: Re: Clueless :)
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:26:58 +0100
Date: 2003-03-21T10:26:58+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EVAea.2582$wK6.108581@news.siol.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x7vfzphycrc.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
Simon Wright wrote:
> The impetus behind the bounded forms is to avoid memory allocation. Of
> course, one of the reasons for doing this is because of a need for
> high dependability (safety-related software, for instance) and I doubt
> that anyone in such an enviromnent will be using off-the-shelf
> component libraries. But if you just want to avoid heap fragmentation
> they can help.
Sorry, I completely forgot about that. In my business I usually don't
know the number of types in advance, and can only speculate about orders
of magnitude of items.
> I do take the point that the first thing I show people in the case
> study ought to be the simplest thing for them to do; that is now done
> using the (new) Unmanaged form, which doesn't require you to specify a
> storage manager (and which should work with GNAT 3.12 for those fixed
> in the past).
The tutorial should also show how to fill the container. I was not able
to find a simple and complete example nowhere, then I've figured it out
from tests. The next step of learning is probably looking into the
sources. I would send my examples, but some people may die laughing :)
Maybe Ada community needs a Wiki?
And yes: do I always have to make separate initialization packages,
because GNAT chokes on this:
with bc.containers.collections.bounded;
procedure club is
type person is
record
name : string (1 .. 4);
age : integer range 0 .. 150;
end record;
package container is new bc.containers (person);
package collection is new container.collections;
package people is new collection.bounded(maximum_size => 100);
club : people.collection;
begin
people.append(club,(name => "nivi", age => 22));
end club;
> You might say, wouldn't this new Unmanaged better be called Unbounded,
> and rename the present Unbounded to Managed? ... well, yes, but the
> people out there using the BCs wouldn't thank me!
If these component are not some kind of joke I would consider doing a
fork in cases like this. You owe it to the kids too :)
Regards, and thank you for the good work.
Karel Miklav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-21 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-18 12:55 Clueless :) Karel Miklav
2003-03-18 16:37 ` Martin Krischik
2003-03-20 21:00 ` Simon Wright
2003-03-21 7:39 ` Karel Miklav
2003-03-21 8:34 ` Karel Miklav
2003-03-21 9:26 ` Karel Miklav [this message]
2003-03-21 18:01 ` Simon Wright
2003-03-18 20:42 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-03-19 6:43 ` Karel Miklav
2003-03-19 2:21 ` Jeffrey Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox