From: emery@goldfinger.mitre.org (David Emery)
Subject: Re: Ada explanation?
Date: 23 Jan 1995 15:44:03 GMT
Date: 1995-01-23T15:44:03+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EMERY.95Jan23104403@goldfinger.mitre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM's message of 23 Jan 1995 05:50:31 -0600
>The truth of the matter is the ISO standardization process of both
>languages is similar: both are on the fast track, both were open to
>public review
There's a slightly misleading statement here. Neither Ada95 nor C++
are using the 'fast track' ISO/IEC JTC1 proceedures. Both languages
have ISO working groups (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9 for Ada and
SC22/WG20(?) for C++). Both language standards are proceeding through
the normal ISO review cycle, including committee drafts, DIS and IS
ballots.
dave
--
--The preceeding opinions do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
--The MITRE Corporation or its sponsors.
-- "A good plan violently executed -NOW- is better than a perfect plan
-- next week" George Patton
-- "Any damn fool can write a plan. It's the execution that gets you
-- all screwed up" James Hollingsworth
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-01-23 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-01-18 16:27 Ada explanation? Bob Wells #402
1995-01-19 23:54 ` Charles H. Sampson
1995-01-20 17:09 ` Roger Labbe
1995-01-23 16:36 ` Norman H. Cohen
1995-01-25 7:01 ` David O'Brien
1995-01-20 5:25 ` Robert Dewar
1995-01-22 3:21 ` David Weller
1995-01-22 14:04 ` Bjarne Stroustrup <9758-26353> 0112760
1995-01-23 11:50 ` David Weller
1995-01-23 15:44 ` David Emery [this message]
1995-01-24 14:10 ` David Weller
1995-01-20 10:25 ` Keith Thompson
1995-01-21 22:05 ` David O'Brien
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox