From: emery@dr_no.mitre.org (David Emery)
Subject: Re: Complexity of "distributed" v "monolithic" (was Re: Ada cost breakpoints)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1993 22:30:55 GMT
Date: 1993-03-24T22:30:55+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EMERY.93Mar24173055@dr_no.mitre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: matwood%peruvian.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu's message of 22 Mar 93 20:13:35 MST
When designing distributed applications, consistency becomes more
important and harder to achieve. If you have a pipe of three
programs, for instance, with a common data stream, it's hard to make
sure that a change to the data stream definition is adopted by all
three programs. In our experience doing client/server in Ada, the
Ada compiler and library system (that so many people complain about)
is instrumental in keeping our distributed software in sync.
dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1993-03-24 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1993-03-15 17:02 Ada cost breakpoints (was Re: Air Force helping to undermine Ada) Michael D Shapiro
1993-03-21 5:19 ` Alex Blakemore
1993-03-21 19:01 ` Ada cost breakpoints Mark Atwood
1993-03-21 22:50 ` Rahul Dhesi
1993-03-23 3:13 ` Complexity of "distributed" v "monolithic" (was Re: Ada cost breakpoints) Mark Atwood
1993-03-24 22:30 ` David Emery [this message]
1993-03-24 22:24 ` Ada cost breakpoints David Emery
1993-03-25 7:00 ` Rahul Dhesi
1993-03-21 23:42 ` Ada cost breakpoints (was Re: Air Force helping to undermine Ada) Michael Feldman
1993-03-22 18:58 ` Robert I. Eachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox