From: emery@linus.mitre.org (David Emery)
Subject: Re: Postscript formatter for Ada?
Date: 10 Oct 90 18:06:38 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EMERY.90Oct10140638@aries.linus.mitre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ssdtom@conan.Claremont.EDU's message of 8 Oct 90 17:38:05 GMT
>From: ssdtom@conan.Claremont.EDU (Tom Radi)
>The ADADL processor (commercially available, and with SIGNIFICANT
>educational discounts) performs a pretty printing of Ada code,
>as well as providing cross reference information etc.
Is anyone else getting tired of reading these advertisments? It seems
like every time someone asks a tool question, someone posts a message
about how ADADL solves that problem (and all others, too).
How about a semi-policy: Please respond to such requests via email
direct to the requestor, and let him summarize. Let's try to keep the
commercial appeals down...
dave emery
emery@aries.mitre.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1990-10-10 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1990-10-07 18:23 Postscript formatter for Ada? Ken Seefried iii
1990-10-08 17:38 ` Tom Radi
1990-10-10 18:06 ` David Emery [this message]
1990-10-11 2:56 ` Michael Feldman
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox