From: stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft)
Subject: Re: A question for compiler vendors/lang experts. redefinition of "="
Date: 1997/12/16
Date: 1997-12-16T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ELAG3w.9C9.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 34964C63.F97005E6@netspace.net.au
Barry and Jackie Schiff (schiff@netspace.net.au) wrote:
: Got one answer from a large compiler vendor when another vendor's
: implementation implies otherwise. Looked in the Rationale and LRM and it
: was hard to find a clear answer. So here is the question for all those
: language experts out there:
: package Foo is
: type objects is abstract tagged record
: Some_value : some_type;
: end record;
: type class_wide_pointers is access all objects'class;
: function "="(left, right : access objects) return boolean; --
: Legal??
: end Foo;
: The question: Is the redefinition of "=" shown above legal and if so
: what are the semantics. Specifically, is "=" a dispatching primitive
: operation or is it ambiguous with the predefined equality defined for
: the class_wide_pointers type.
It is a dispatching operation of type Objects. It does not
override the predefined operator for type class_wide_pointers, whose
profile is:
function "="(left, right : class_wide_pointers) return boolean;
However, essentially all cases where you use the function will be
ambiguous. For example, if you "use" package Foo, then:
x, y : class_wide_pointers;
begin
if x = y then ...
is ambiguous, as is:
procedure blah(a, b : objects) is
begin
if a'access = b'access then ...
It is not easy to construct a case where a use of your operator won't be
ambiguous with a use of the predefined "=" operator for a named access type.
: --------------
: In my reading the LRM it seems to me that the spirit of access
: parameters is that the above operation is a dispatching operation. I
: have had a large Ada compiler vendor tell me that the above is
: ambiguous.
These are not incompatible statements. It is a dispatching operation,
and almost all uses of it will be ambiguous.
: ... While another compiler implements that above as a dispatching
: operation. Can anyone point me to the definitive answer in the LRM.
You are both right.
: Thanks in advance. If it is not to much trouble could you email answer.
Will do.
: --Barry Schiff
--
-Tucker Taft stt@inmet.com http://www.inmet.com/~stt/
Intermetrics, Inc. Burlington, MA USA
prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-12-16 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-12-16 0:00 A question for compiler vendors/lang experts. redefinition of "=" Barry and Jackie Schiff
1997-12-16 0:00 ` David Weller
1997-12-16 0:00 ` Tucker Taft [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox