comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: anon@anon.org (anon)
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2009
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:32:52 GMT
Date: 2009-03-25T19:32:52+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EFvyl.81548$4m1.67493@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6fed8e4c-8e90-4c4e-9424-f763afd8335e@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com

Most of JAVA projects are still running.  Some of these were Ada 95 that was 
switch to Java 1.1. And the still work today, just can not compile them 
without a complete rewrite.

Also, check with SUN!  Back in the 1990's with the introduction of JAVA 1.1 
they said the concept of deprecating functions was a design mistake, but it 
too late now to alter the course of JAVA.


In <6fed8e4c-8e90-4c4e-9424-f763afd8335e@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>, Martin <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com> writes:
>On Mar 25, 12:37=A0am, a...@anon.org (anon) wrote:
>> Might be true, but Java shows the oposite. In JAVA each newer release you
>> will find some functions either altered or replaced. =A0People do get ups=
>et but
>> would they switch, not on their life. =A0And that saying is more truer fo=
>r the
>> Ada programmer then all Java people combine.
>
>Java isn't intended for long living projects. But who is to say that
>it won't go in a release or two? Perhaps AdaCore have given 'fair
>warning' to their paying customers?
>
>Cheers
>-- Martin




  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-25 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-19 19:49 GNAT GPL 2009 Martyn Pike
2009-03-19 23:01 ` roderick.chapman
2009-03-20  6:44   ` Martyn Pike
2009-03-20  2:51 ` anon
2009-03-23  8:18   ` Alex R. Mosteo
2009-03-23 10:07     ` anon
2009-03-23 10:28       ` ficorax
2009-03-23 21:11         ` anon
2009-03-23 21:25           ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-03-24  6:42             ` anon
2009-03-24  7:28               ` ficorax
2009-03-24  9:12               ` Martin
2009-03-25  0:37                 ` anon
2009-03-25  7:53                   ` Martin
2009-03-25 19:32                     ` anon [this message]
2009-03-25 21:32                 ` sjw
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox