From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Elaboration of nested packages.
Date: 1997/06/19
Date: 1997-06-19T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EC0434.22@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: yrQ8RCAF8EqzEwgc@marnhull.demon.co.uk
In article <yrQ8RCAF8EqzEwgc@marnhull.demon.co.uk>,
Bill Keen <billy@marnhull.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> package PI is new OP.IG; -- Is this ok?
No. It should raise P_E (in both Adas 83 and 95).
>I can't find a statement corresponding to 11.1-7 in the Ada95 RM. Has
>the meaning of program_error changed in Ada95?
No. The rule is cleverly hidden (;-)) in 3.11(13-14).
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-06-19 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-06-18 0:00 Elaboration of nested packages Bill Keen
1997-06-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-22 0:00 ` Bill Keen
1997-06-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox