From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Address to function pointer conversion
Date: 1997/06/16
Date: 1997-06-16T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EBvL5A.Dx3@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5o39sm$2fl6@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
In article <5o39sm$2fl6@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>,
Michael Paus <michael@ifr16.luftfahrt.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote:
>...The only portable solution I see at the moment is to import the
>dlsym function several times for each anticipated function pointer
>type. This is not a very nice solution but I think it should work.
The above sounds reasonable, if there aren't too many different such
function prototypes.
On the other hand, if you insist on the flexibility of the
unchecked-conversion method, then it might make more sense to
unchecked-convert from one access-to-subp type to another (both types
being pragma Convention(C)). This is more likely to be portable in
practise than unchecked-converting from type System.Address to
access-to-subp. No guarantees, of course.
- Bob
prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-06-16 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-06-13 0:00 Address to function pointer conversion Michael Paus
1997-06-13 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1997-06-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-13 0:00 ` John G. Volan
1997-06-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-17 0:00 ` John G. Volan
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-25 0:00 ` Michael Paus
1997-06-14 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-06-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-16 0:00 ` Michael Paus
1997-06-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-16 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1997-06-16 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-06-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-17 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-16 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox