From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Tasking Techniques - Opinions?
Date: 1997/06/05
Date: 1997-06-05T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EBB1DL.5BK@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5n2hjr$ohm$1@news.pacifier.com
In article <5n2hjr$ohm$1@news.pacifier.com>,
Steve Doiel <steved@pacifier.com> wrote:
>Now the question:
>Is this a reasonable implementation? Or is there a better
>approach?
>
>I am making almost no use of Ada's "rendevous," and am leaning
>more toward using protected types to pass data through queues.
If you don't need the "extra" functionality of rendezvous (which is
quite often true), then it's perfectly reasonable to use protected
types, and never use rendezvous. That is, declare all of your tasks
without any entries.
- Bob
prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-06-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-06-04 0:00 Tasking Techniques - Opinions? Steve Doiel
1997-06-03 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1997-06-07 0:00 ` Steve Doiel
1997-06-04 0:00 ` bsanden
1997-06-04 0:00 ` Samuel A. Mize
1997-06-05 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-06-06 0:00 ` Samuel A. Mize
1997-06-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-10 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-06-04 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-06-05 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox