From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus)
Subject: Re: Why don't large companies use C/C++/OOP?
Date: 12 Dec 94 11:39:18
Date: 1994-12-12T11:39:18+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EACHUS.94Dec12113918@spectre.mitre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar@cs.nyu.edu's message of 10 Dec 1994 08:56:33 -0500
In article <3ccc2h$756@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
> People are actually writing NEW 370 assembly language programs for
> the PC!
This is the most masochistic thing I've heard of all week! (But
the week is still young yet... ;-) As far as I am concerned, 360
assembler makes 8086 assembler look like a great leap forward. The
360 does have a general register set, but the "normal" addressing
modes are a nightmare.
--
Robert I. Eachus
with Standard_Disclaimer;
use Standard_Disclaimer;
function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...
prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-12-12 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-12-08 22:37 Why don't large companies use C/C++/OOP? Curtis
1994-12-09 18:49 ` Larry Liang
1994-12-10 13:56 ` Robert Dewar
1994-12-12 11:39 ` Robert I. Eachus [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox