From: eachus@mitre-bedford.arpa (Robert I. Eachus)
Subject: Re: Navy Counters Ada Mandate?
Date: 11 Dec 92 23:07:08 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EACHUS.92Dec11180709@oddjob.mitre.org> (raw)
In article <SRCTRAN.92Dec11150428@world.std.com> srctran@world.std.com (Gregory
Aharonian) writes:
Talk about a nice big loophole for circumventing the Ada mandate,
given the uncertainty about how to define when something is COTS
(i.e. how many copies do I have to sell 1 - 10 - 100?). For
example, for a big telecommunications project for the Navy, could
ATT make a bid based on the millions and millions of lines of C/C++
code it uses in its commercial networks?
Sure it could. If, for example, they bid an ESS4 switch with the
software as an NDI (non-development item) and software support
guarenteed for some number of years at a fixed price per year. The
number of copies of the product that ATT sells it part of the overall
risk assesment.
Now if ATT says, "We are going to use our existing software but
modify it to meet your requirements. The code development will cost
$X million dollars, and take N months." Now the Ada mandate kicks
in...
--
Robert I. Eachus
with Standard_Disclaimer;
use Standard_Disclaimer;
function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...
next reply other threads:[~1992-12-11 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1992-12-11 23:07 Robert I. Eachus [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1992-12-11 20:04 Navy Counters Ada Mandate? Gregory Aharonian
1992-12-10 21:06 Currie Colket
1992-12-04 11:27 Walter Dence
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox