From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Why no constraint error?
Date: 1997/03/22
Date: 1997-03-22T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E7GAL1.1Ky@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: E7G5q1.J8q.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com
In article <E7G5q1.J8q.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>,
Tucker Taft <stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com> wrote:
>Well Bob, I believe GNAT is technically right in this one, ...
Can you quote chapter and verse, to show where my analysis was wrong?
(Legalistically, I mean -- ignoring issues of what's
desirable/efficient/etc.)
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-03-22 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-03-20 0:00 Why no constraint error? Samuel Mize
1997-03-20 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1997-03-21 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-03-22 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1997-03-22 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
1997-03-24 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1997-03-24 0:00 ` Samuel A. Mize
1997-03-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-03-24 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-03-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-03-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-03-22 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox