From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Warning: Flame Bait
Date: 1996/11/29
Date: 1996-11-29T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1nLxo.Ly3@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 01bbdcb5$7500ab30$24af1486@pc-phw
In article <01bbdcb5$7500ab30$24af1486@pc-phw>,
Paul Whittington <paul@sage.inel.gov> wrote:
>...The fact of the matter is that Ada is more portable,
>more scalable, and has a far more complete, tested and mature
>multithreading model than Java, including complete thread-safe programming
>support with full guarding capabilities. ...
I'm not a big fan of Java, but I don't see how anyone can say that Ada
is more portable than Java. The Java language definition nails down all
kinds of things that are "implementation defined" or "unspecified" in
Ada.
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-11-29 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-11-27 0:00 Warning: Flame Bait Paul Whittington
1996-11-29 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
1996-11-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-11-30 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-11-30 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-11-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-12-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-02 0:00 ` IEEE fp & Java Clayton Weaver
1996-12-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-09 0:00 ` Fergus Henderson
1996-12-01 0:00 ` Warning: Flame Bait Tom Robinson
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox