From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Erroneous concurrent operations on hidden objects
Date: 1996/11/21
Date: 1996-11-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E187sG.Int@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mazzanti-2011961559220001@131.114.200.115
In article <mazzanti-2011961559220001@131.114.200.115>,
Franco Mazzanti <mazzanti@iei.pi.cnr.it> wrote:
>I still cannot see the difference between the case of two tasks
>performing a "Put" operation on standard outut, where a hidden object
>representing the "file" is concurrently updated, and the case of two tasks
>concurrently calling "new" (or an instance of unchecked deallocation) on
>the same storage pool, where a hidden variable associated to the pool
>is concurrently updated [RM-13.11(2)].
I agree that the RM isn't quite clear on this point, but I'm pretty sure
the above is the "intent".
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-11-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-11-20 0:00 Erroneous concurrent operations on hidden objects Franco Mazzanti
1996-11-21 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-11-19 0:00 Franco Mazzanti
1996-11-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox