From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Type conversions forced by derived type: alternative?
Date: 1996/09/05
Date: 1996-09-05T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Dx8Hv9.Aqt@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: udk9uadn0n.fsf@tanana.llnl.gov
In article <udk9uadn0n.fsf@tanana.llnl.gov>,
John Woodruff <woodruff1@llnl.gov> wrote:
> type Object is new Implementation.Tree; -- subtype doesn't fit here
Object inherits the primitive ops of Tree, so...
> if Item_Of(Implementation.Tree (O)).Label = "Hello" then
the type conversion should not be necessary. Unless I'm missing
something. I assume Item_Of is a primitive op of type Tree, and should
therefore be inherited by type Object?
- Bob
prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-09-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-09-04 0:00 Type conversions forced by derived type: alternative? John Woodruff
1996-09-05 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox