From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: GNAT vs other compilers
Date: 1996/08/09
Date: 1996-08-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DvvJ1y.753@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.839546529@schonberg
In article <dewar.839546529@schonberg>, Robert Dewar <dewar@cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
>P.S. This is pushing the limits of what is appropriate to this newsgroup,
>but, I think, no more than Dave is pushing them :-)
I can't speak for everyone, obviously, but *I* don't see anything wrong
with this discussion. Lots of people on this group want to know stuff
about various vendor's Ada products, so why can't the vendors tell them?
It's not like you guys are hawking memory chips or something -- now
*that* would be inappropriate. (Or, say, get-rich-quick pyramid
schemes!)
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-08-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-08-06 0:00 GNAT vs other compilers Patrice Saintonge
1996-08-07 0:00 ` Dave Wood
1996-08-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-09 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
1996-08-10 0:00 ` Dave Wood
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox