From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: looking for a fast re-usable non-pointer data structure ....
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:15:15 GMT
Date: 2001-11-12T17:15:15+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DsTH7.21855$xS6.33416@www.newsranger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9sookc$d83$1@neptunium.btinternet.com
In article <9sookc$d83$1@neptunium.btinternet.com>, Tony Gair says...
>Any ideas, has anyone used an avl tree as a remote protected objected
>object with the distributed annex,
>Should I dump the annex...or the avl tree
Its probably just a matter of properly defining the stream attributes for your
AVL tree so that the distributed annex can use them. But going through that
process does not sound to me like a task for beginners or the faint-of-heart.
---
T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
No trees were killed in the sending of this message.
However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-12 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-12 23:02 looking for a fast re-usable non-pointer data structure Tony Gair
2001-11-12 17:00 ` Kevin Rigotti
2001-11-12 17:15 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2001-11-12 17:37 ` Jeffrey Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox