From: bs@research.att.com (Bjarne Stroustrup <9758-26353> 0112760)
Subject: Re: Java Risks (Was: Ada News Brief - 96-05-24
Date: 1996/06/06
Date: 1996-06-06T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DsK3EL.3us@research.att.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4p0njd$9a4@isnews.csc.calpoly.edu
wbrooks@lwaxana.acs.calpoly.edu (Bill Brooks) writes
> In article <31B2B06A.43FE@lmtas.lmco.com>,
> Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lmtas.lmco.com> wrote:
> >Brian N. Miller wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> A disbelieve that C++ is evolving awkwardly. Is there a publication
> >> which claims so? Or is this 2-bit usenet opinion? ;')
> >
> >See Plauger's comments in Embedded Systems Programming, for example.
> >(I'm not sure why an opinion in a publication is necessarily better
> >than one on the Internet, but nonetheless, there it is...)
> >
>
> I too tend to disbelieve claims that C++ is evolving awkwardly, but
> anyone who hasn't seen the <em> reams</em> of material published on
> this topic must be living under a rock! The number of articles on the
> error-proness of C++ exception handling alone could supply all the
> material for a graduate level seminar.
>
> Start out with: <quote>The Evolution of C++: Language Design in the
> Marketplace of Ideas</quote>, 1993, edited by Jim Waldo, which traces
> the history of C++ from USENIX conferences to today's most popular
> OOPL. Waldo concludes that the language at one point had a clear
> design center, but that it doesn't now.
For a contrary view see
Bjarne Stroustrup: The Design and Evolution of C++
Addison Wesley ISBN 1-201-54330-3
by and large I think the committee has done an excellent job and that
ISO C++ will be a close approximation of what I hoped for.
- Bjarne
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-06-06 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-05-24 0:00 Ada News Brief - 96-05-24.txt [1/1] AdaIC
1996-05-27 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1996-05-27 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1996-05-28 0:00 ` Richard Riehle
1996-05-29 0:00 ` Andreas Zeller
1996-05-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-01 0:00 ` AdaWorks
1996-06-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-01 0:00 ` Mike Young
1996-06-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-04 0:00 ` Richard Riehle
1996-06-01 0:00 ` AdaWorks
1996-06-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-05-30 0:00 ` Java Risks (Was: Ada News Brief - 96-05-24 Richard Riehle
1996-05-31 0:00 ` Brian N. Miller
1996-06-02 0:00 ` Richard Riehle
1996-06-03 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-06-04 0:00 ` Bill Brooks
1996-06-06 0:00 ` Bjarne Stroustrup <9758-26353> 0112760 [this message]
1996-06-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-05-31 0:00 ` Java Risks (should be Java mis-speak) The Right Reverend Colin James III
1996-06-02 0:00 ` Richard Riehle
1996-06-03 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
[not found] ` <4omoh4$k0f@ansible.bbt.com <4ov36b$1665@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
1996-06-04 0:00 ` Java Risks (Was: Ada News Brief - 96-05-24 Richard Riehle
1996-05-31 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-01 0:00 ` Java Risks David Hopwood
1996-06-02 0:00 ` Java Risks (Was: Ada News Brief - 96-05-24 Richard Riehle
1996-06-01 0:00 ` Bob Crispen
1996-06-05 0:00 ` Alan Brain
1996-06-03 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-06-03 0:00 ` Imonics Corporation
1996-06-07 0:00 ` Peter Wentworth
1996-06-05 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-06-05 0:00 ` Bill Brennamw
1996-06-08 0:00 ` Brian N. Miller
1996-06-09 0:00 ` Jim Kingdon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-06-03 0:00 Jon S Anthony
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox