From: kst@thomsoft.com (Keith Thompson)
Subject: Re: simple problem?
Date: 1996/05/14
Date: 1996-05-14T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DrDv4L.3xG@thomsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: DrCsG5.K46@bton.ac.uk
In <DrCsG5.K46@bton.ac.uk> je@bton.ac.uk (John English) writes:
[...]
> Umm, this guy appears to me to be talking Ada 83 (which didn't allow
> instantiation of Sequential_IO with an unconstrained type), not 95.
Ada 83 doesn't specifically forbid instantiation of Sequential_IO (or
Direct_IO, for that matter) with an unconstrained type. Whether it's
actually allowed depends on the implementation. There's at least one
Ada 83 implementation that allows Sequential_IO(String) but rejects
Direct_IO(String).
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@thomsoft.com <*>
TeleSoft^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Alsys^H^H^H^H^H Thomson Software Products
10251 Vista Sorrento Parkway, Suite 300, San Diego, CA, USA, 92121-2718
This sig uses the word "Exon" in violation of the Communications Decency Act.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-05-14 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-05-09 0:00 simple problem? Frank Cheung
1996-05-10 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1996-05-10 0:00 ` Kevin D. Heatwole
1996-05-10 0:00 ` John English
1996-05-10 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-05-13 0:00 ` John English
1996-05-13 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-05-14 0:00 ` Keith Thompson [this message]
1996-05-10 0:00 ` John Herro
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox