From: Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A simple question about the "new" allocator
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 12:49:03 -0600
Date: 2014-08-12T12:49:03-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DktGv.521654$Ro3.320929@fx13.iad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a93a7da9-e3cc-410f-a7dc-f81ea8c179e5@googlegroups.com>
On 12-Aug-14 04:29, sbelmont700@gmail.com wrote:
> procedure main is
> begin
> loop
> declare
> Test : access Positive := new Positive;
> begin
> null;
> end;
> end loop;
> end main;
I /think/ you can do it with a type definition on the inner-block:
declare
Type Inner_Access is not null access positive;
Test : Inner_Access := new Positive;
begin
null;
end;
The reason is that leaving the nested-block's scope should force the
deallocation of all Inner_Access types if I'm remembering the RM correctly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-12 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-12 6:54 A simple question about the "new" allocator NiGHTS
2014-08-12 7:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2014-08-12 13:38 ` G.B.
2014-08-12 10:29 ` sbelmont700
2014-08-12 18:49 ` Shark8 [this message]
2014-08-12 19:10 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-12 21:53 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-08-12 22:34 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-12 23:14 ` sbelmont700
2014-08-12 23:41 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-13 7:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2014-08-13 15:04 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-13 20:32 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-08-12 15:10 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-12 16:07 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-08-12 19:58 ` Robert A Duff
2014-08-12 17:51 ` NiGHTS
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox