From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Possible Memory Leak
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:21:51 -0600
Date: 2004-11-23T15:21:51-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DaCdnXi08L4_ND7cRVn-hw@megapath.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 41a38ae3$0$43611$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net
"RAMatthews" <ramatthews@noone.nowhere> wrote in message
news:41a38ae3$0$43611$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net...
> But note that its the ARM's wording that bothers me (my
> code works OK with GNAT).
>
> It was on noticing those paragraphs (7.6(21.x)) that made
> me wonder if my code might encounter a problem with a
> different compiler - and indeed whether the Standard is
> correct.
A general remark: if you have a problem with the wording of the Standard,
it's always a good idea to check the cross-reference listing of AIs to see
if there is already an issue open for the paragraph in question. That way,
you can see if you have found something new, or are just rediscovering an
already known issue. See http://www.ada-auth.org/AI-XREF.HTML#Section .
Randy Brukardt
ARG Editor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-23 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-19 17:27 Possible Memory Leak R A Matthews
2004-11-22 23:00 ` Brian May
2004-11-23 19:09 ` RAMatthews
2004-11-23 21:21 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2004-11-23 21:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-11-25 17:49 ` RAMatthews
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox