From: mjmeie@ss5.magec.com (Mike Meier)
Subject: Re: DOD-STD-1679A(Navy)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 1995 12:23:59 GMT
Date: 1995-03-23T12:23:59+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D5w7rz.8Lp@ss3.magec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3kn9ic$b2k@michp1.redstone.army.mil
Doc Elliott (helliott@losat.redstone.army.mil) wrote:
: In article <50716@suned1.Nswses.Navy.MIL>, sws@mercury.nswses.navy.mil
: says...
: >Ummm... Show me the software with no known problems, and I'll show
: >you the software that hasn't been tested.
: Or you'll be showing me software that has been thoroughly tested.
Actually, even thoroughly tested software always has some trouble reports
since the customer -always- exercises the option to submit priority 4 and 5
trouble reports for operator inconveniences and suggested improvements.
I've never known a program where the customer (and contractor) didn't feel
some improvements could be made, but didn't feel it was important to get them
all into the current version.
Mike Meier
Magnavox Electronic Systems Company
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-03-23 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-03-07 3:02 DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Mark Cronan
1995-03-07 4:50 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) verne
1995-03-08 12:44 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Doc Elliott
1995-03-09 17:05 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Garlington KE
1995-03-18 1:30 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Scott . Smart CDR
[not found] ` <3jkddt$mk1@michp1.redstone.army. <50716@suned1.Nswses.Navy.MIL>
1995-03-21 18:12 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Doc Elliott
1995-03-23 12:23 ` Mike Meier [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-03-10 14:52 DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Jeff Seigle
1995-03-10 15:37 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Garlington KE
1995-03-11 4:22 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) verne
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox