Re: Overloading for T and T'Class

[jgv@swl.msd.ray.com (John Volan)]

bbalfour@acm.org (Brad Balfour) writes:

>In article <3aa6mf$t3j@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>, dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM
>(David Weller) wrote:

>> In article <CzAF7q.29E@inmet.camb.inmet.com>,
>> Tucker Taft <stt@dsd.camb.inmet.com> wrote:
>> >The above is legal, though a call would generally be ambiguous.

Hmm ... I seem to have missed this whole exchange.  Looks like my
newsfeed must have gone down over the weekend.  Apologies to Tucker
for prodding him for an answer in my second post.

>>
>> Ah good, then I'm entirely correct for saying the next thing to Brad
>> Balfour:
>>         See, Brad, I _told_ ya so!

>Well Dave...
>  If you'd stuck around for a few minutes longer you'd have witnessed the
>site of 5 language lawyers/DRs (including Bob Duff and Gary Dismukes who
>produced the right answer) all strugling with this one. We figured that
>the amount of money that it cost to answer the one question (at language
>lawyer rates) was nearly enough to pay off the national debt :-). 

Gee, maybe I should've kept my big mouth shut in the first place ... NOT!  ;-)

					John Volan

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--  Me : Person := (Name                => "John Volan",
--                  Company             => "Raytheon Missile Systems Division",
--                  E_Mail_Address      => "jgv@swl.msd.ray.com",
--                  Affiliation         => "Enthusiastic member of Team Ada!",
--                  Humorous_Disclaimer => "These opinions are undefined " &
--                                         "by my employer and therefore " &
--                                         "any use of them would be "     &
--                                         "totally erroneous.");
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------