From: beckwb@ois.com (R. William Beckwith)
Subject: Re: Is C/C++ the future?
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 1994 13:53:52 GMT
Date: 1994-10-14T13:53:52+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Cxo19s.5MJ@ois.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CwLqrD.KDo@bocanews.bocaraton.ibm.com
Bernie Thompson (bernie_thompson@bocaraton.ibm.com) wrote:
: In <CwLAx0.GxJ@world.std.com>, srctran@world.std.com (Gregory Aharonian) writes:
: > As an example of what Lucky is referring to, Taligent (an IBM/Apple/HP joint
: >effort) is releasing this summer a developer release of the TAE (Taligent
: >Application Environment) - a collection of 100 frameworks, comprising over
: >2000 C++ classes and over 30,000 member functions, and who knows how many
: >million lines of C++ code.
: > Convert? Certainly not any customer of TeamAda member IBM. IBM's future
: >OO plans will be based on its' VisualAge and VisualGen.
: >Greg Aharonian
: VisualAge uses SOM as its underlying object binding method.
: Taligent will provide SOM wrappers for its C++ classes.
: SOM is language-neutral. Although ADA bindings havn't yet been
: produced (to my knowledge), there is nothing to prevent it.
: And that would mean Ada code could call/subclass/etc all of that
: C++ code.
OIS and MITRE have written an IDL to Ada 95 mapping document. Someone
_is_ working on a SOM/Ada 95 product. Talk to oec@ocsystems.com.
: The judgements here are that use of anything other than C++ would be
: rejected by the marketplace.
You guys are going to miss the boat with this kind of thinking.
Watch out. Your competition thinks Ada is a crucial technology
and market. You've been warned.
: Bernie
... Bill
--
e-mail: Bill.Beckwith@ois.com | Team Ada
Objective Interface Systems, Inc. | dist, full O-O
1895 Preston White Drive, Suite 250 | multithreading
Reston, VA 22091-5448 U.S.A. | built in
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-10-14 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-09-23 15:55 Is C/C++ the future? Gregory Aharonian
1994-09-23 16:36 ` David Weller
1994-09-23 21:38 ` Bernie Thompson
1994-09-24 12:20 ` David Weller
1994-10-14 13:53 ` R. William Beckwith [this message]
1994-10-14 19:11 ` John Barton
1994-10-15 17:01 ` R. William Beckwith
1994-10-19 18:57 ` Brad Brahms
1994-10-21 11:56 ` James Hopper
1994-10-25 0:40 ` Robert Monical
1994-10-25 18:08 ` Michael Feldman
1994-10-26 3:13 ` Richard Riehle
1994-10-25 19:36 ` Brad Brahms
1994-10-25 23:46 ` Michael M. Bishop
1994-10-26 2:09 ` Michael Feldman
1994-10-26 9:21 ` David Emery
1994-10-27 1:52 ` R. William Beckwith
1994-10-27 20:52 ` Michael Feldman
1994-10-27 23:23 ` R. William Beckwith
1994-10-28 19:00 ` Michael Feldman
1994-10-28 9:14 ` Robb Nebbe
1994-11-01 4:25 ` Michael Feldman
1994-11-01 14:48 ` David M. Tannen
1994-11-01 23:46 ` AdaWorks
1994-11-02 4:29 ` Carlos Perez
1994-11-02 7:35 ` Dag Bruck
1994-11-05 0:03 ` Michael Feldman
1994-10-26 3:47 ` Richard Riehle
1994-10-31 13:07 ` Fred McCall
1994-11-01 11:29 ` Robb Nebbe
1994-11-01 18:19 ` Richard Riehle
1994-11-02 2:16 ` Michael Feldman
1994-11-07 11:15 ` David Emery
1994-11-02 3:49 ` Is C/C++ the future? (LONG LONG POST) Greg Harvey
1994-11-07 11:20 ` David Emery
1994-11-08 3:07 ` Nathan Hand
1994-11-10 7:17 ` Vince Risi
[not found] ` <1994Oct30.210203.1863@muvms6>
1994-10-31 11:23 ` Is C/C++ the future? Marc Wachowitz
1994-10-31 19:02 ` Richard Riehle
1994-11-05 1:52 ` Bill Janssen
1994-10-21 12:32 ` R. William Beckwith
1994-09-27 13:51 ` Joseph Skinner
1994-09-28 23:47 ` Michael M. Bishop
1994-10-14 19:11 ` jjb
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1994-09-29 18:14 Carlos Perez
1994-10-13 15:41 Bob Wells #402
1994-11-11 10:33 (No Name)
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox