* Re: Ada9x Question/Comment FOR EXPERTS [not found] <1994Sep1.234903.1591@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com> @ 1994-09-02 14:02 ` Wayne Magor [not found] ` <3476d0$7ea@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Wayne Magor @ 1994-09-02 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <1994Sep1.234903.1591@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com>, bschiff@stc.lockheed.com (Barry Schiff) writes: >It would have been nice if a portion of the parent's body was made visable >to the child packages to solve this but I am sure this would cause other problems. Make a private child package and put the declarations in that. The body can "with" the private child. Wayne. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <3476d0$7ea@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>]
* Re: Ada9x Question/Comment FOR EXPERTS [not found] ` <3476d0$7ea@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> @ 1994-09-05 7:21 ` D Elson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: D Elson @ 1994-09-05 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw) dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: >If I depend on a child spec, which needs (at the spec level remember) >visibility to some private declarations, which in turn require with >dependencies on some units, then clearly all my clients are dependent >on these units as well. There is no way around that. No, there is not. I have 2 more words to add to the discussion: "types packages" Del ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1994-09-05 7:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1994Sep1.234903.1591@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com>
1994-09-02 14:02 ` Ada9x Question/Comment FOR EXPERTS Wayne Magor
[not found] ` <3476d0$7ea@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
1994-09-05 7:21 ` D Elson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox